A parenting coordinator with decision-making authority, also known as a Parenting Coordinator with Decision-Making (PCDM), is a professional appointed by the court to assist parents in resolving parenting disputes and making decisions regarding their children. This role is typically used in high-conflict custody cases or situations where parents struggle to communicate effectively and reach agreements on parenting matters.

The parenting coordinator with decision-making authority has the power to make decisions on specific issues related to the children’s welfare and well-being. The specific decision-making authority granted to the coordinator may vary depending on the court order or agreement. The coordinator’s decisions are typically binding unless either parent files an objection with the court within a specified time frame.

The primary objective of a parenting coordinator with decision-making authority is to reduce conflict between parents, facilitate effective communication, and help parents focus on the best interests of their children. They may assist in resolving disputes related to visitation schedules, medical or educational decisions, extracurricular activities, and other parenting matters.

It’s important to note that the role and authority of a parenting coordinator with decision-making authority can vary based on jurisdiction and the specific court order or agreement that establishes their role. Therefore, it’s always advisable to consult with a legal professional or local authorities to get accurate information regarding the specific guidelines and procedures in your jurisdiction.

Colorado Revised Statutes Section 14-10-128.1 defines a parenting coordinator as a neutral third party who helps resolve disputes between parties about parental responsibilities. The parenting coordinator can listen, negotiate, and make suggestions to both parties.

The court appoints a parenting coordinator upon motion by either party, or by written agreement of the parties. The parenting coordinator must be a neutral person with appropriate training and qualifications and an independent perspective acceptable to the court.

The parenting coordinator can assist with disputes including, but not limited to, the implementation of court-ordered parenting plans.

IRM Bochner-22CA441 (23COA63)-When a party challenges a court-appointed DM’s decision in court and the decision is substantially upheld after a de novo hearing section 14-10-128.3(4)(b), C.R.S. 2022 entitles the nonmoving party to attorney fees.  But the do novo hearing must be an evidentiary hearing.  Here, the Magistrate did not hold a evidentiary hearing so the nonmoving party was not entitled to attorney fees.  The Appellant here is pro se but lost the appeal.  The Magistrate conducted a “de novo review” of the DM’s decision, held a status conference with only party’s counsel present and issued an order. 

For a free telephone consultation about PC/DM’s in Colorado please call today!  303-688-3045. Written by Marc Patoile.